Blog

Second Degree Heroin Manufacturing & Distribution Dismissed in Monmouth County, NJ: A Victory by William Fay, Esq.

The legal system in New Jersey takes drug crimes incredibly seriously. When a client faces a Second Degree charge for the Manufacturing and Distribution of Heroin under N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5B(3), the stakes could not be higher. This is a felony offense with life-altering consequences.

A Second Degree conviction for manufacturing or distributing heroin carries the presumptive sentence of 5 to 10 years in New Jersey State Prison, along with a potential fine of up to $150,000.

For one client in Monmouth County, NJ, this harsh reality was staring them down. However, the aggressive and strategic defense provided by William C. Fay, Esq. led to the complete and favorable dismissal of all the Second Degree charges. This case is a powerful testament to the necessity of a skilled attorney who understands how to expose the flaws in the State’s evidence.

Understanding the Gravity of the 2C:35-5B(3) Charge

The statute N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5B(3) targets the manufacturing, distributing, or dispensing of heroin. Specifically, this subsection applies when the quantity is less than one-half ounce, including any dilutants or adulterants.

While the quantity is relatively small, the presence of heroin is what elevates the crime to a Second Degree offense, triggering the severe penalties:

• Prison: 5 to 10 years in State Prison (presumptive term).
• Fines: Up to $150,000.
• Record: A permanent felony conviction.

A dismissal in a case this severe is not a matter of luck; it is the direct result of a meticulous, well-executed defense strategy.

Strategic Defense: Why the Case Was Dismissed

As a seasoned attorney, Mr. Fay brings an unique’s perspective to criminal defense. He immediately went on the offensive, focusing on the weakest links in the prosecution’s case. In drug manufacturing and distribution cases, a dismissal is often achieved by successfully challenging the source of the evidence or the State’s ability to prove all elements of the charge.

Key defense strategies employed likely included:

1. Challenging Fourth Amendment Violations (Illegal Search & Seizure)

The core of many drug cases is whether the police followed the law when they gathered evidence. Mr. Fay likely investigated every detail of the police procedure to determine if the client’s constitutional rights were violated:

• Lack of Probable Cause: Arguing the police did not have sufficient legal grounds to conduct a stop, search, or apply for a warrant.
• Motion to Suppress: If the search that uncovered the heroin or manufacturing materials was conducted illegally (e.g., without a valid warrant or proper exception), Mr. Fay filed a Motion to Suppress Evidence. If granted, the evidence is thrown out (Exclusionary Rule), often leaving the State with no case.

2. Disputing the “Manufacturing” Element

“Manufacturing” is defined broadly, but the State must prove the client was engaged in activities like compounding, packaging, or preparing the drug. Mr. Fay often challenges the State’s classification by:

• Distinguishing Personal Use vs. Manufacturing: Arguing that the materials found were consistent with personal consumption (e.g., small quantities for a few days) rather than a commercial-level manufacturing/distribution operation.
• Lack of Equipment: Demonstrating the absence of key manufacturing tools, chemical precursors, or sophisticated equipment needed to process the drug, thereby undermining the “manufacturing” claim.

3. Attacking the Chain of Custody and Lab Reports

The State must prove, unequivocally, that the substance seized is indeed heroin and that its weight meets the legal threshold.

• Forensic Scrutiny: Demanding an independent review of the State’s forensic lab reports and challenging the qualifications of the analyst or the accuracy of the testing methods.
• Chain of Custody Defects: Highlighting any instance where the custody of the seized heroin was compromised or undocumented. A break in this essential chain creates reasonable doubt, often resulting in the exclusion of the evidence.

The Final Result: Complete Dismissal

By strategically leveraging his legal expertise and meticulously challenging the State’s case at every juncture, William Fay, Esq. presented a compelling defense. Faced with insurmountable legal hurdles and constitutional challenges, the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office recognized they could not meet their burden of proof.

The result was the complete dismissal of the Second Degree Heroin Manufacturing and Distribution charges. This extraordinary outcome meant the client walked free, avoiding years in prison and having their future secured from the devastating impact of a felony record.

Protect Your Freedom: Contact a Skilled Monmouth County Defense Attorney

When you are charged with a serious drug crime like Second Degree Manufacturing and Distribution, your choice of attorney is the most important decision you will make. You need a defense lawyer who is not afraid to challenge the government and has a proven track record of securing dismissals in complex cases.

William C. Fay, Esq. offers the dedicated, knowledgeable, and aggressive representation you need.

If you are facing serious drug charges in Monmouth County, NJ, contact the William C. Fay, Esq. today for an immediate, confidential consultation.